Obviously, this is a situation for which we are clearly in disagreement. I agree with the Supreme Court that, I hope, will lay out the process that the Court has asked for.
In my view, we have responded to the Supreme Court's request, especially with regard to the questions you have asked. I have already indicated that under proposed paragraph 85.2(c), even with all of the specific protections laid out, the special advocate is free to call upon the judge in order to obtain further opportunities to pursue his or her discussions with the client in order to protect the latter's interests.
In clause 85, we can see that there is much protection. Later on, there are other protections, that are not specifically designated, but are there. If, even with all of these provisions, the advocate wishes to do something else in view of the evidence or of the concerns of the detainee, he or she will be able to call upon the judge in order to obtain other powers, other possibilities.