Thank you.
I have the same question that my colleague Serge Ménard had with respect to the absence of solicitor-client privilege being fine but the non-compellability of the advocate not being explicitly recognized. In fact the advocate is not explicitly prohibited from disclosing that information, not just to the crown, but to anyone in the world. One is putting the individual at a great disadvantage. He or she can't get any information out of that solicitor-client privileged information, but he or she is at risk of being exposed to the entire world, maybe in a book ten years from now, or in a newspaper column, or maybe actually to the crown. Why is there hesitation to explicitly providing that individual that protection from disclosure?