Can I ask you a question? I don't mean to badger you. You're civil servants, and you're being very civil to us. But it is up to the civil servants to actually explain the rationale as to why certain protections might be missing. You say that it wasn't your intent to actually make that information disclosable, which is slightly narrower than information being non-disclosable, or the individual compellable. I take your remark at its face value, but I am left wondering what the rationale is, and I can't comprehend it for the life of me.
Thank you.