Thank you very much for being here. I do appreciate your comments and what we've heard today. I think they will add a great deal to what the committee has, because of your experience.
One of the things I noticed, particularly with my colleagues opposite, is that when you said some of these issues will be challenged in court if they are put in, in the current manner, you suggested that if we accept the SIRC model, or some of your suggestions, they wouldn't be challenged. I'm not sure that's really a fair assessment. My experience has been that the role of a lawyer is to challenge the legality of these things against the charter.
Is it really fair to say that if we accept what you suggest, they won't be challenged by someone? Perhaps it won't be by you--you understand it--but by someone else who understands it a different way and feels the need to challenge it.