I'll pass on that and let Professor Forcese....
I just want to comment on your comment. I know the case you're talking about is Ahani, because that was a well-publicized case. The difference between Ahani and virtually every other security certificate is that Mr. Ahani didn't dispute most of the facts in his case. He accepted that he had been involved in the activities that were alleged.
All of the other security certificates that I'm aware of involve people who deny that they're members of the organizations, and the evidence that is relied upon by the government.... Well, the only other case that was like that was that of the Russian spies. Ultimately—I was involved in that case—we didn't get into the evidence, but in the end they admitted they were Russian spies. Most of the time in these cases, the key evidence and the evidence is withheld.
Craig, why don't you deal with the SIRC issue?