Two changes are on deck right now, as Lorne mentioned. Now, in the new rules that will govern special advocate procedures, there's a more emphatic obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence. There's an affirmative obligation on the government now to reveal all relevant information, including exculpatory evidence, and then in the new regulations there's a point-by-point discussion of the due diligence the government has to undertake to ensure that it has adequately searched its files to find relevant information. That's coming onstream right now.
The other change, which will follow in the wake of the House of Lords decision at the end of October, which has not yet been codified, is again the idea of a balancing test. How much information goes to the interested party or not will be assessed not simply on whether national security would be prejudiced, but also on whether that national security interest is outweighed by the broader interest in a fair trial. It will now, presumably, be permissible in the U.K. system for information to be disclosed where there's a relatively incidental national security interest, but a massive fair trial interest at stake in the case.