I understand. You are telling me that this is contained in paragraph 5. I had not understood that.
I however remain skeptical. What attitude will the person wishing to have a special advocate he or she is able to trust have when that individual sees the advocate accompanied by another lawyer who is there to supervise the special advocate in order to ensure that he does not divulge to the individual information that this person should not have? One must have a very well trained legal mind to understand all of these subtleties. I am not convinced that the individual involved will be as trusting as we would like him or her to be.
I understand that you have provided for that in paragraph 5, but the language could perhaps be a little clearer. I understand that that is what you wanted to say.
I however remain skeptical with regard to the level of trust that the individuals involved will have in this regard. I also believe that the use of the word “défenseur“ is deceptive. That is not what this is about.