Unfortunately, I didn't bring the Convention Against Torture document with me today. I read it last night. But even on that last point, what's being suggested is a contravention of the Convention Against Torture. We either support the convention or we don't support it. Let's not be hypocrites about it.
I approve of some of the suggested amendments. At least you put into the bill that torture evidence cannot be used as a basis for a security certificate, and that's why it has to be tested.
For example, if the person identified in the certificate hasn't had a chance to know what that particular evidence is, the type of information that may come forward, and he or she can't respond to it, then we don't have due process.