Thank you.
Mr. Waldman and Mr. Forcese suggested the following solution this morning. If the government considers it to be extremely important or potentially dangerous that the special advocate could, having seen the secret evidence against the named person, inadvertently pass on information to him or her that he is not entitled to provide, the special advocate could, based on our proposal, be joined by a representative of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service for the purposes of a meeting with the named person, although the latter would also be bound by a type of professional privilege. Of course, he may not necessarily be a professional.
What do you think of that solution?