Yes, Mr. Chairman.
I would like to know if I understood your point correctly, and your impression of the governement's position. I believe that the Supreme Court explained why our procedure is not consistent with the Charter. The court told Parliament that it was up to it to find a solution that would pass the charter test, whereas the government's action suggests that it thinks the Supreme Court handed down a decision telling it what it should do in order to make the procedure Charter-proof.
In fact, you believe that that is not what the Supreme Court told us. That is the first thing the court told us, and you came here in order to help us do what we must in order to make it charter-proof, did you not?