With respect to the criticism in the United Kingdom, which is really what I was referring to, it wasn't so much the notion of a security certificate as the idea of a special advocate and their role in that process. That's where our particular concern lies. We do not feel that the special advocate model proposed, and a special advocate model even with some enhancements, will be sufficient to ensure that an individual's fair trial rights and the ability to mount an effective defence are truly safeguarded. That's why we've proposed the idea that instead of focusing energy on strengthening and improving the ability of an individual's own lawyer, providing them with that level of defence.
I think Ms. Hall probably has more knowledge about the European scene than I do.