The three points you've mentioned are all important, but they're not nearly sufficient. One of the fundamental points I would make is that we're talking about, in effect, taking away somebody's liberty and putting them in solitary confinement for years. This is the effect of it.
In our legal system, one of the fundamental points we should always be able to relate to is that if somebody is judged or is being assessed whether they're competent to stand trial, one of the criteria we look at is, are they able to assist their counsel in their own defence? If they are not allowed to have access to the information, if they don't know the specifics of the allegation, they can't even begin to do this.
So through an administrative sleight of hand, we are taking away somebody's liberty, putting them in what is, arguably, the most severe punishment our system can mete out, and doing this to somebody who has not been found guilty in a criminal court of anything but is being held on the basis of suspicion.
With regard to the points you've made, I respect what you're telling us, that you understand there is only so much you can do on this committee. So we would ask that you do what you can on this committee, but the point is that this is really not even beginning to deal with the issue.