Right.
In general, I would point the committee to a very recently released--November 27--general comment, only the second in history by the Committee against Torture. The Committee against Torture categorically includes within that prohibition ill treatment, because prison conditions and conditions of detention very often are categorized as ill treatment as opposed to torture. You have the very sensational vision of torture--for example, being strung upside down and being electrocuted. The committee has made a decision that within the definition of torture itself comes those practices that would constitute ill treatment.
What I would say to that is that in general in Canadian law, and in general in anything that this committee passes, there should be a prohibition against evidence extracted under torture or conditions of ill treatment.
That is my response to your query.