Thank you.
I have quite a few other questions.
The fact is that this bill has passed second reading and was referred to this committee. One would assume from that it's the will of the House of Commons that this not die in February, otherwise the House would not have passed it through second reading, so it was referred to this committee.
In Mr. Harkat's committee report under “spin”, it says that the Supreme Court decision essentially upholding the security certificate process is misleading. The fact is that the Supreme Court did uphold the constitutionality of the process, so we are here to see if there is any way it can be improved. I know that Mr. Dosanjh already asked that question, but I think that's really what we need to stick to as much as possible.
I realize you believe that the whole process should be scrapped, but at this point it's likely that we can either improve it—that's what the purpose of this committee is—or here's another opportunity. I realize that you would like to see it more under criminal standards, but I think the court is trying to find a balance between the security of Canadians and human rights.
Fire away. Each of you has an opportunity, and I think we may have a few minutes left, so go ahead.