You want an answer. Let me ask you another question, and then you can answer.
One of the themes we hear from many presenters, including you, is that this is an immigration process and we have a double standard. The fact is that immigration law applicable to both residents and visitors has been separate and different. You can be deported for different reasons. Even if you're not a terrorist or a very dangerous criminal, sometimes you're deported. That standard has been in existence for several decades. Security certificates came into being to deal with organized crime several decades ago. Yes, they've been around since 1970-71, but one of the things I hear is that that's unconstitutional.
Are you then suggesting that we shouldn't have those standards embedded in the Immigration Act that deal differently and can send people out of the country--even permanent residents--on things that citizens couldn't be exiled for?