I understand that. My point is, shouldn't we be advocating this to try to push it off? The reality is that while our requirements won't change, theirs will. There's an expectation that an American citizen is going to have a passport to get back in. Surely we're not going to allow people in and not remind them that if they don't have a passport they're going to have a lot of trouble getting home. That requirement is going to have real implications.
But maybe I'll come back to this, because I don't have a lot of time.
The other thing, which continues that theme, is that some jurisdictions have been very progressive in trying to find alternatives to this in order to keep the casual travel going, because it's so important to both of our economies. I had an opportunity to talk with Governor Gregoire about what Washington State is doing in conjunction with Premier Campbell respecting enhanced drivers licences. Given that there's been very small pickup of NEXUS—and let's be honest, a NEXUS pass is not something the person who wants to go to a Buffalo Bills game is going to get, and not the thing that somebody who wants to go to a Stratford Festival play on a whim is going to have applied for months in advance—what type of work are you doing to ensure that we can find solutions for these casual travellers, most of whom don't have passports, most of whom aren't going to get a NEXUS pass? Do you support the enhanced driver's licence, and what efforts are being made to ensure that we can keep those casual travellers moving?