Thanks, Mr. Holland.
First of all, in the broadest context we have been working for over a year now on our Olympics plan and preparation for the kinds of things that the CBSA is going to have to do in the run-up to and around the Olympic Games. We anticipate that a significant amount of the traffic we're going to see come into the country for the games will come through our major airports, and we've made fairly substantial provisions to ensure that we have the right number of staff, the right amount of overflow capacity, the right degree of technology deployed in the airports to deal with it.
At the land border, for traffic northbound, particularly through the southern B.C. corridor, the first thing to remember is that Canada's documentary requirements are not changing with the advent of WHTI. Our focus has been on ensuring that at our southern British Columbia border points we have good plans in place to deal with a range of potential volume propositions through all of those border points. We have worst-case scenarios, and beyond-worst-case scenarios, and we've done testing and modelling to see how those border points are going to hold up under these various scenarios. I feel fairly confident today that the kinds of contingencies we're putting in place and the sorts of resources we'll deploy, at both airports and marine and land borders, will be equal to the task.
Concerning the U.S. date, I have constant discussions with my U.S. counterparts on their preparation for implementation in June. I have no knowledge about any intention on their part to deviate from the current date and I can't shed any further light on that, other than to say—and I'm sure you're aware of this—that Secretary Clinton and Secretary Napolitano have recently certified their readiness, from a documentary and an infrastructure point of view, to go ahead with the June date.