I seem to be apologizing a lot.
I would make two comments. If I could add the word “knowingly”, I would feel more comfortable, because the reality is that in many cases, you don't know. That's the first point.
The second point is that I would reserve, on the side, that one-in-a-thousand or one-in-a-million--whatever it is--case that we all talk about and that I don't raise simply for simplistic, argumentative, and legalistic.... The simple truth is that if we get information that can prevent something like the Air India bombing, the twin towers, or whatever, frankly, that is the time we will use it, despite the provenance of that information. Those are minuscule. Everything else is for building in a system that ensures that we respect and follow Canadian values.
So with those two caveats--knowingly and in that one instance--yes.