I have a question to Mr. O'Brian, CSIS.
There was quite a lot of discussion in both the O'Connor report and the Iacobucci findings that the use of particular language and terms such as “jihadist”, “Islamic extremist”, etc., can open the door to a slipshod and casual process in which guilt is assigned by association, which is a phrase Mr. O'Connor used. Are these phrases that your organization has stopped using in reports and information-sharing? Is that something that you've avoided, this labelling?