There is a whole range of sexual offences under the Criminal Code. At a drunken office party, a person who is otherwise a very law-abiding citizen commits an indiscretion—and I don't want to minimize that at all. I'm a woman and I understand that. I don't want to minimize that at all. If we take the mandatory system in Ontario, if that person who committed and was convicted of that sexual assault—that kiss at an office party—goes on the registry, is that a reasonable limit on that person's freedom, to achieve the objective we're trying to achieve with this legislation? For ten years after serving that sentence, the guy who kisses the colleague at the office party, should that person's privacy be limited for a period of ten years? Does that make sense? Is that an appropriate use of that power?
That may be an example of one situation where it may not be appropriate, but that's up to you guys to decide.