I don't think any of us would want to diminish anyone's human rights, but there is a balance here. This week, as you may or may not know, at a reception I attended on Parliament Hill, we had with us the victims of terrorism. As a new parliamentarian, I must say...the witness was one of the Air India victims who was speaking to parliamentarians, and parliamentarians of all political parties were in attendance.
You've stated in your remarks today that you feel the O'Connor report is the final word on a structure or a mechanism and that the forthcoming Air India report by Judge Major will add little or nothing to what Judge O'Connor has suggested. I would just make this comment and look for your reaction to it. Twenty-four years ago, the worst terrorism attack in this country happened to those individuals. Over the course of those 24 years, they have never received, in their terms, acceptable outcomes of their advocacy.
In my mind, it seems to me that not to wait for such an important report--if it were only to corroborate as a second opinion what Judge O'Connor has said--would be a strategic mistake. So I'm wondering how you can be so firm in your comment that the O'Connor report is the mechanism and there's little to be added by the Air India report that's forthcoming.