Excuse me, sir, you and I would have to agree, quite frankly, that human rights should be non-partisan, but some people like, for political purposes, to make insinuations about a Canadian political party.
I have said at this committee and other committees, and say so in public, that I do not believe that any current political party in Canada—and when I talk about political parties, I'm talking about those that have seats in this House of Commons—would purposefully and overtly injure someone's human rights or, in other words, go counter to generally accepted human rights. It's the very fine details that we may disagree on, from time to time, of the manner in which we get there.
I want it clearly understood that I don't like to make political points when it comes to human rights, but I think we need to understand some of the motivations that may be less than pure.
You mentioned the United Nations Commission on Human Rights. I think you said something to the effect that it condemned Canada's handling of a certain situation. Succinctly, again, what did they condemn that Canada did, just so I understand?