I think I can sum up some of these things. I would echo the two sets of comments that have been made. One is that we ought to look at what works, and what works is to ask how you eat an elephant and to realize it's got to be one bite at a time. The enhanced driver's licence is far more successful in Washington State than it is in British Columbia. They've marketed it exceptionally well and completely gotten on board. Things like the integrated border enforcement teams that the RCMP were involved in are successful. Why? Because they're small. They have developed personal communications and relations of trust. In those smaller confines, there are all sorts of initiatives that I'm familiar with, particularly within Washington State. They're successful because they create manageable relationships. When you look at it in the macro, it's too much to handle. Just in a geographic sense, the border is massive.
The other point is that we need to change our entire discourse with respect to the border. It is simplistic to speak about it as a mere security line. This does not mirror how borders have functioned in history. They are always lines of socialization as well. An identity is also integrally linked to what a border is there for. It has been this way since the Roman Empire, where borders were more of a socialization exercise than a security exercise. If we go down the security road, we will have to mirror the projects that are going on south of the border.