I understand that; I support the concept.
A concern has been raised, and I guess I'm seeking some assurance on it. Let's take the example I gave of voyeurism. In the absence of judicial discretion, how does that line get drawn when clearly there are examples where the offence warrants inclusion? There may be other offences where it's a lesser offence of voyeurism. Not to diminish it, but it doesn't require the person being put on the registry, which is a concern. Certainly, those advocating for privacy had concerns with it. How does that line get drawn in the absence of judicial discretion?