Right. Let me give an example on the counter again, just for my clarification. Let's say you have an individual who's in one apartment overlooking another apartment, and somebody has left their window open and the person is looking over there and they shouldn't be. They're caught, they're called, and they're charged with being voyeuristic. They clearly shouldn't have done it, but it isn't perhaps the type of offence that would warrant somebody being on the registry.
How does that line get drawn? I guess that's what I'm saying. It's very different from having somebody prowling around on somebody's property, peering into their windows at night. That's a different kind of offence. I'm just wondering how we draw that line and make sure.... If we have people who are added to the registry who don't belong there, it can slow things down, because then it kind of removes the purpose of it. Then you have to go and question people who really aren't the ones who are in your top priority to question. I'm just trying to understand that line a little bit.
I understand it as you've described it. Maybe just talk about an example like the one I've talked about.