Boy, that's a whole bunch of questions. I'll do my best to address them.
The bulk of your comments about the power of those programs, I would endorse 100%. That's part of our message. When the programs are accredited and delivered by appropriate staff at the appropriate time in an offender's sentence, they work well. That part of our system, we should be proud of.
With respect to your last comments about other countries around the world, I can tell you that the Correctional Service of Canada constantly hosts delegations from other places in the world that want to learn about Canadian best practices. I have been fortunate to deal with correctional practitioners from Australia, New Zealand, Great Britain, and the United States, and I can tell you that they look to Canada for a certain leadership.
Please understand: we're not attacking or questioning the quality of the existing programs. What we're questioning is the capacity to deliver those programs, and what we're worried about is the applicability of those programs to a particular group of offenders—those with mental health issues. At Warkworth, for example, the last time I counted, there were 103 sex offenders wait-listed for the core sex offender program. Wait-listed at Warkworth!