I think it's not an issue of whether the recommendations that have been brought forward by the correctional investigator in the past are good or bad. There's no question from our perspective. We recognize the thrust of the issue that has been brought forward. The problem we have is that sometimes the specific solution that's being proposed is not manageable in the long run or runs contrary to some of the other pieces. For the most part, we're not in disagreement with the root issue. Where there's debate at times is on the best solution to move the agenda forward.
We've been working relatively closely with the Office of the Correctional Investigator over the last couple of years to try to find a better formula for raising issues and bringing forward solutions so that we get out of this cycle of seeing the same recommendation or same type of recommendation over and over again. We do not disagree with the main thrust of his report. We know we have to do work around mental health. We know we have to do work around aboriginal offenders. We've made some significant progress in terms of how we do investigations and the kind of information that's done. We've made significant progress around women offenders. Sometimes the debate is between a specific solution that's being proposed and what is sustainable, or in some cases, what can be funded within the existing budget.