I mentioned it in passing not as something I supported but rather as something that would be an improvement on the existing condition. But I believe that the amendments before you are the right way to go; they are what I would support. I really meant to point a contrast: that the gaps that existed were not considered, thought-out gaps by judges applying judgment; that the gaps that existed right now were through either plea bargains or oversights. To me, this situation does not offer a good reason to keep those gaps.
The automatic inclusion model has worked in Ontario. It is a good model. I think it should be applied here, and that's what is in the proposal in front of you.