I have difficulty with the argument that registration would interfere with someone's rehabilitation. I'm not sure how that prevents their reintegration into society. It may mean they have obligations a little more than others, but those are obligations that have been earned through conduct. All kinds of different people have different obligations in society.
We have to keep our eye focused, as policy-makers, on the overall outcome of public safety and the safety of the community. That's my view of the principal priority here, and I think that principal priority is best served by automatic inclusion of sex offenders in the registry.