I know my friend is a lawyer with long-standing experience, and I guess the difference between a subjective standard and an objective one is that ultimately someone has to make the decision. The only question is whether or not you build into legislation a text that is in the opinion of someone, which is unchallengeable, or whether you build into the legislation an objective standard. But I think the more trenchant observation is the one by Ms. Campbell where she points out, much to my chagrin and embarrassment, that there is a section later on that does provide for a way for a person to get an exemption. Although it doesn't really deal with the matter that I was bringing before the committee, it does give me some comfort.
I'm happy to withdraw that amendment on the basis that there is an exemption process and someone could make that application.