All right, on that basis, I would support it.
The objections that I've heard, to this point, rest with difficulty of incorporating the word “modus operandi” in the bill. That strikes me as odd. While Latin is not one of our official languages, there are many words incorporated into both English and French that are directly Latin. I would suggest that the word “caveat” is a perfect example of a Latin word that's often used in a legal context. In fact, there are many expressions in law that are directly lifted from Latin. So it's my understanding that “modus operandi” is a valid legal term. In fact, it's commonly used in both the English vernacular and
in French, in the vocabulary of people who speak French. Those people say "modus operandi", not something else, and the context is of course clear. That is why it is logical for me to support this motion of Mr. Ménard's.