Mr. Chairman, could I add something? This follows up with the question by Mr. Norlock as well. I think this committee's recommendations are going to be important to the way we proceed forward with any potential bills to amend the legislation. I believe it's been an issue that all of these issues have been parked pending the completion of the five-year review with respect to the government's policies to be developed respecting many of these issues. And I would also point out that the Supreme Court of Canada, in the case of Rodgers, had commented in its dicta that they thought it a good idea to have judicial oversight on the issuance of convicted offenders orders, but that it wasn't necessarily legally required given the privacy protections that had been instituted around DNA samples in the DNA data bank.
So it is now my opinion, at least, that the way is open for us to consider amendments to the legislation to allow it to be considered to be taken at time of arrest or charge, depending on which way we have to go with fingerprints as well, and that potential as there, but that debate could now be put forward to Parliament for further consideration.