Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
I thank you for your very interesting presentations.
I'm interested, of course, in the balance you talked about between the security need and the important invasion of privacy this represents.
Mr. Rondinelli talked to us about legislation creep. I don't want to be an alarmist, but there is a big brother scenario that looms over this type of thing. There is 7% of the U.K. population now in a data bank. Legislation creep could conceivably lead to somebody deciding in five or ten years' time that this information is very useful for other reasons.
Does that loom anywhere in your concerns from a privacy perspective? It sounds to me like you're taking a minimalist approach, with only as much invasion of privacy as is required by the functions we're talking about. Would you care to comment on that?