No, I'm fine. Thank you very much, and I apologize for having to leave for a few moments.
My question is for Ms. Pollak. Let's say that in the minds of Canadians your organization is the watchdog of CSIS, with the mandate, to use the words of Justice O'Connor in describing the mandate of SIRC, to look at CSIS with respect to “compliance with law, policies, ministerial directives and international obligations and for standards of propriety expected in Canadian society”. I think that's a good, broad definition of the work people expect you're doing.
We've talked about the complaints process, where individuals come forward, but as a watchdog, to use that metaphor, could someone like Mr. Abdelrazik or any other Canadian expect that if your agency became aware of, for example, what I see in the Globe and Mail today—a strong indication, if not proof, that CSIS may have been involved in Mr. Abdelrazik being arrested and maltreated in Khartoum—it would be something that your agency would, of its own motion, start sniffing around, but not bark as a watchdog, very quickly to find out on behalf of Canadians and Mr. Abdelrazik, or someone in his circumstances, if our obligations are being met and something wrong is not going on? Is that something you do on a regular basis?