Do you consider that information obtained by torture is reliable? For example, let us take Mr. Khadr's interrogation when he accused Mr. Arar of having been in Afghanistan. Mr. Arar subsequently denied the allegation and presented evidence to show that was not there, he was somewhere else.
Do we not see there, indirectly, a demonstration of the fact that, when a person is tortured, he is ready to say anything to stop the torture and that information obtained in that way is not reliable? In a way, this casts into doubt the analysis that is done in the name of national security.