Excuse me for interrupting you, but I only have about three minutes left. I understood you clearly and be assured that we will be considering it when we write our recommendations. I have heard you elsewhere as well. I understand the inconsistency very well.
I would like to move to another matter. You say that you have received additional funding to conduct a comprehensive review of the impartiality of RCMP investigation of members alleged to have committed criminal offences.
I would like a short answer. When you say “alleged to have committed criminal offences“, do you mean someone who has been formally charged in court or someone against whom a complaint has been made for behaviour that might constitute a criminal act and who, if the investigation revealed that he had indeed committed that act, would be charged in court?