I think the example is the issue of destruction of notes that came before the Supreme Court in January. The committee has on several occasions recommended that CSIS not destroy its notes, that it keep its notes for the purpose of being able to get back to more than what's out there or what CSIS has. The committee made that recommendation on several occasions. Finally, the whole issue came before the Supreme Court of Canada last January. The court said that CSIS should be keeping notes in accordance with section 12, which is on retaining intelligence information.
That's one of the examples where we made recommendations that were not followed, and it finally came to resolution this year.