Specifically, the outrage is a little disingenuous when one party in the House of Commons didn't vote for that--and I'd like to say that on the record. The Bloc members did not support that.
The last one I'll finish up with was introduced in the Senate today--the faint hope clause. Do you think it might go the same way as the mandatory minimums for human trafficking when it comes to actual debate? Should Parliament be unanimous on that one as well?