Just to answer the question, I'm being prescriptive because I can agree to this as long as we're ensuring that we're dealing with it in time to deal with clause-by-clause. That's why it's an important part of my support of the overall motion, because if we're hearing witnesses on June 11 and we leave no time for clause-by-clause, then we won't report back to the House in the prescribed time.
On April 28th, 2010. See this statement in context.