Minister, I, too, have deep respect and recognize that in the policing community, as in any community, there's going to be divergent opinion. You're not going to get 100% on anything. So I respect of course that we have a very excellent officer here, I'm sure, from New Glasgow. We had three retired officers from Winnipeg. So of course we would expect there's going to be outlying opinion.
I'm wondering what your opinion is on this. Even if we were to assume that somehow the police associations, which are elected by rank-and-file police officers, are somehow not representing police, and even if we were to assume that the divide that is attempted to be painted here indeed existed, and let's say only 50% instead of 98% of those on the front lines of keeping our communities safe said that this is an important tool and it saves lives and they need it to do their jobs, would that not unto itself be sufficient, if you say that 50% of officers said this was a tool that they used and needed for their job?