Again, I think you raise a really important point. It's part of the reason it's important to look at rates per 100,000. That's basically what public health and epidemiologists consider, as well as criminologists. They look at the rates per 100,000 of crimes and death because that gives you an indication of the severity.
And you're absolutely right; in fact, I have the Criminal Code incidents right in front of me. Toronto has one of the lowest rates of firearms homicide in the country and certainly one of the lowest rates of firearms deaths.
If you talk to the Canadian Paediatric Society or the Association for Adolescent Health or the Canadian Public Health Association or the suicide prevention groups, they will tell you that young people are more at risk of being killed with firearms in rural communities, and in the west and in the north, than they are in downtown Toronto because availability is such a critical issue. In fact, as you note, children are often caught in the crossfire of domestic violence when firearms are involved--very often in rural communities.