Mr. Chair, if I could, the problem I'm having with what you're saying is that, first, the motion is substantive; and second, the motion would follow after this motion. So even if I were to accept your ruling, a motion introduced on the floor, out of the blue, would follow the motion that is already duly presented before committee.
One can't walk in and say, “Well, I've decided to bring a motion to the floor with no notice”, and supplant a motion that's before us. There's clearly an order--even if I were to accept your ruling--in which the motions would need to be dealt with. That's the traditional practice of the committee.
So even if I were to accept your first logic, there's a problem with the order in which these are dealt with. This is not the appropriate time to be dealing with a motion off the floor.