Well, I guess there are two parts to this, and we've heard what they are. The first part is to basically tell folks what we're about—when I say “folks”, I'm talking about the public at large, the taxpayers—and what business we believe should come before the committee. And it's wholly appropriate, I think, to then go in camera and begin to discuss the witnesses and perhaps what order that business should take.
I don't see where the order in which we do business would deviate from any past practices. The fact is we're just simply outlining where the government intends to go. What is very public is the legislation that has come before Parliament, and the government's indication as to what legislation will be coming to this committee.
I think it is wholly appropriate for everyone to know what the intention of this committee is with regard to government business and--I think equally as important--some of the things that this committee has been studying for quite some time. As a matter of fact, I can think of one study that we're doing that is almost two years old, or at least well into a year-plus. So I don't think it's a secret that way. After that, going in camera is wholly and totally appropriate.