Thanks, Mr. Chair.
I have two points to make. My first point is the one that the chair just made: the committee always has the opportunity to review an issue if it doesn't feel it's working. So I don't think there's a need to support this motion, and there certainly isn't a need for the kind of urgency I'm hearing.
The second point, and it's just as important, is the fact that this is modelled after Christopher's Law in Ontario. This is something that is in place, working, and seen to be highly effective. This committee has just taken a lengthy period of time to review that law, and we have seen it to be effective.
So I don't understand or see the need for it, and on that basis won't be supporting it.