That's fine. It has gone up in terms of denials, but in the end these aren't significant numbers in terms of absolute numbers. When I read this bill, the first question I'm looking at is why: why has this particular bill has been introduced? What problem is it trying to solve?
Based on what you've indicated--and I don't want to misquote you--I got the impression you were saying that this bill has been introduced because of the court decisions that say various factors need to be taken into account. You're saying this bill will solve the court case issues by providing additional factors for the minister to consider.
Is that what you're saying, that this is going to correct an error in the law as pointed out by judges?