Right. I understand that there is discretion and that the minister can make whatever decision he wants as long as it's rationally connected. But the one direction in the current legislation or the one thing the minister cannot avoid is that he must consider four factors. That has to be the case: “the Minister shall consider the following factors...”. If the minister didn't consider those factors, there would be a successful judicial review.
Under the current proposed legislation, that would change. The minister would not be required to consider any of those factors. That's what I'm driving at. I'm not getting a satisfactory answer that would tell me that the minister would be required to take into account these factors, when it clearly says that he or she is not required to. That's the concern.