Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I apologize.
Is there any Federal Court decision that suggested that the criteria be changed from mandatory to permissive? No? Okay.
Second, you talked about following up where there's a difference between finishing a sentence in, let's say, the United States versus Canada. I would suggest that there's a clear advantage to finishing a sentence in Canada, which we've talked about: access to rehabilitation, parole conditions in the community, and the fact that we would know about the conviction.
I would suggest that those are clear indicia that would suggest it's preferable to have a person be transferred here rather than have the person come back across the border without us necessarily knowing. Is that a fair statement generally?