You talked about a criminal network. If someone came back who had a criminal network, my understanding is that it likely would be, and in fact has been, a reason under the current legislation to deny a transfer of someone, under the threat to the security of Canada. That issue has come up. Is that not right?
I think what we're saying is that if you come back to a prison in Canada, what we're having difficulty understanding is how that's a threat to public safety, because you're coming back into a prison. So the only thing you could possibly constitute a threat to is other people inside the prison. One example you used, I think, was the criminal network.
But my understanding is that under the current criteria, that would likely be a valid reason to bar someone. The Federal Court decided, though, that when the minister made that decision, the only problem was that there was no evidence that this was the case. But the criteria of having a criminal network would likely be a reason to bar under the current legislation, would it not?