--so you could say that he didn't have any rehabilitation. Well, it's because it wasn't offered.
So the point I'm making here is that regardless of whatever, let's say he writes a letter and says it's because of any one of these or, as in proposed paragraph 10(1)(l), “any other factor” that he considered relevant within whatever extremely broad constraints we're talking about. What is the accountability mechanism to hold that minister to account if he or she is really reaching in giving some reason that really stretches it and everybody goes “well, wait a second, that doesn't make a lot of sense”?
Because as I'm reading it, other than providing a letter, there's no other mechanism of accountability.