I think I again have to emphasize that my role as a public servant is to explain the bill, to provide factual details. I think that if we get into the area of motivation or aims, I would suggest that it's a question that might be better answered by a government representative.
Certainly I would say that one of the issues has been to take into account the court decisions, because we have had a number of them. So one of the elements of the bill, obviously, is intended to try to address those. Will it solve it completely? I can't comment on that, but it is to address what the courts have said to us.